Let the Music Move You...

How frustrating it must be for the authorities: Here is the mainstream media trying to cast the Thaipusam Incident (Exercise Calm and Restraint over Thaipusam) as a public disorder issue.  It's probably a result of alcohol they say, which only goes to show the wisdom of the recently proposed regulations to severely restrict the drinking of alcohol in public around Singapore.  But it seems like the Singapore public has gone in a completely differently direction much to the chagrin of the authorities.

Photocredit: Channelnewsasia

Some point out the policy inconsistency, citing the example of the insanely noisy and rambunctious Getai performances during the Hungry Ghost Festival.  Others point out the inanity of sticking to a policy decision simply because it was decided decades ago.  Then there are others who question why Thaipusam isn't a public holiday, only to receive the even more shocking (an satire worthy) come back from the authorities that Vesak Day's (celebrated primarily by the Chinese Buddhists in Singapore) count as a Indian festival for which a public holiday's been granted.

Photo credit: Yahoo Singapore

I can't speak for the Singapore authorities, though I think I can sympathise with the predicament of the civil servants and policymakers.  One of the biggest taboos in the civil service is to admit that a policy is flawed, hence the official line repeated ad nasuem that this was the way it's been since the decision was made in 1973 (with the implication being that since no issue was raised for decades, Singapore had given her tacit agreement).  To do a U-turn on a policy, either to now allow a range of musical instruments, or allow for rowdy music, or to declare Vesak day a Chinese Buddhist holiday instead doesn't actually cause any immediate damage to social order.  But it does mean admitting you've been wrong.  It'll also send out the message that the government will bend other public pressure.  

How can a strong and stable government do that?  I suppose it depends on whose perspective you're taking.  From the pioneer generation perspective, it makes sense.  But for an increasingly globalised younger generation, a strong and stable government is precisely one responds honestly and meaningfully to public debate, and does the right thing.  And of course, sometimes the right thing to do is to simply admit you could have made a mistake.  Even if the authorities stick with their original decision (i.e. the ban on music, or not declaring Thaipusam a public holiday), we will go some way in building public confidence in our leaders.